Use of microbial inoculants provides more rapid and efficient conversion of raw organic materials into compost. Now the heap temperature come down to normal than add one week old composting culture, an organic product has the potential to play the role of promoting growth and providing immunity in plant system ferment this material for 5-7 days for raising the microbial load in drum. Add water to dilute (if require) and apply this fermented liquid @ two to three liter per hole and repeat the same process three times at every 7 to 10 days intervals for accelerating the decomposition process. Presence of naturally occurring beneficial and effective microorganisms (EMOs) predominantly lactic acid bacteria (lactobacillus) Yeast (sacchacromyces), Actinomycetes (streptomycetes), photosynthetic bacteria and certain fungi besides beneficial and proven biofertilisers such as Azotobacter, Azospirillium and Phospho-bacteria were detected in panchagavya.
Take the following material, pore in water and cow urine in a drum for uniform solution and add in each hole as recommended one time only after the hole making process. Value addition for better nutrient content for fortified the compost quality as per the composition given below:
Sl.No |
Method of Composting/ Maturity Time |
Merits of Method |
Demerits |
Adoptability |
Labor and Cost |
Remarks |
1. |
NADEP Compost 90-120 days |
Produced aerobic compost |
Strucuture cost is high |
Promoted by government |
Medium to high |
Much propagated by govt. but due to cumbersomeness |
2. |
Bangalore Method Acharya 1939 70-90 days |
Good quality of compost |
Frequent turning |
Limited adoptability |
High labor cost |
High labour and cost resulted in less replicability |
3. |
Indore Method 60-90 days |
Good quality of compost |
Frequent turning in three pits |
Limited adoptability |
High labour cost |
High labour and cost resulted in less replicability |
4 |
Pit Manure 180-210 days |
Most common method |
Some time immature compost |
Moderate popularity |
Minimum labour |
Poor quality compost |
5. |
Four pit Method 90 days |
Produces Good quality of compost |
Alternate filling of four pits |
Non popular |
Costly |
Less adaptability due to higher cost |
6. |
Open Window Compost 60-80 days |
Easy method of Composting |
Imperfect maturity |
Very less |
Laborious and high input cost |
Less applicable due to non-availability of raw material |
7. |
Polyethylene Covered Compost 45-60 days |
Easy method of composting |
Aeration require through blower |
Not popular |
Less labour and cost |
Impractical approach due to wear and tear |
8. |
Heap Manure 180-250 days |
Simple method of compost production |
Immature compost production |
Most popular method in farmers |
No cost |
Poorest quality compost due to non technical approach |
9. |
Wet & Drying Compost 40-50 days |
Fast composting process |
Laborious method |
Labor oriented method |
High labor cost |
Less adaptable due to high labour |
10. |
Biogas Compost 40-60 days |
Good quality compost |
Some time difficult to apply |
Becoming popular |
Little bit costly |
Costly and due to technical flow of subsidy |
11. |
Safal or fortified compost Maximum 40-45 days |
Very good quality compost |
Very easily applicable |
Very effective and quality output |
Little or no cost with 3 hour labour only |
Becoming most popular wherever adopted due to quick maturity and that too of a bigger heap at one time |